Detail vs readability in JHAs and procedures
The more detail that goes into a JHA/procedure the less readable it becomes. Detail and comprehension are negatively correlated in my opinion. How do you guys find the middle ground?
Comments (7)
In my opinion, the point of the JHA isn't about the details. It is to make sure that employees are having that morning meeting and verbally discussing the hazards they will face that day. Some of the best JHA huddles I have been a part of were documented on a piece of cardboard.
In some instances, the foreman, or supervisor, will fill out a detailed JHA and just have everyone sign it, without reviewing it. Some controlling contractors are happy with that kind of thing, but I think that it defeats the purpose.
I comply with OSHA however ours really gets detailed due to I have PT helping me out on specifics.
I have had issues in the past with laser safety plans having way too much information. I usually work with the employee to make sure we are only including information pertinent to EHS hazards. You may want to look at your existing JHA template and see if it needs revision. You could make clear what information is required using comments and/or highlighting (if your template is a Word document).
A JHA document tailored for field activity needs to be short enough to review with a field crew without losing them. One to two pages. Keep in mind a JHA is for hazards, and doesn’t have to list every step or task. Point out the hazards and perhaps touch on every step during discussion.